Hi. My name is Amit Kumar. I was a student at Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, until shameless professors at IIM Lucknow failed me under the influence of Dr Jamshed Jiji Irani and Tata Steel HR, and forced me to join back as a worker at the Jamshedpur steel plant of Tata Steel Limited.
The reality of IIM Lucknow beneath all the hype may startle many. I am doing my bit to expose the reality of the institute. I will try to substantiate my claims with evidence. Only if the judiciary in India could be free of corporate shackles, then I would have got justice long ago.
In the video below, I describe my situation.
It started when I was a factory worker at Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur Works. Owing to my humble background, my family was unable to bear the cost of my education after I passed my class 10 examination. So, I joined as a worker at Tata Steel’s factory in Jamshedpur and began funding my further education with my earnings. I finished my class 12 and graduation with a History Honours degree from a nearby college while simultaneously working at the factory to fund my education.
I was exceptionally good at my work at Tata Steel but I always kept my aspirations and higher education hidden because the management does not like the workers studying and leaving Tata Steel for better jobs or getting promoted. The management at Tata Steel only wants the workers to work, period. But with reduction of wages and deteriorating work conditions, I couldn’t bear seeing myself working at Tata Steel my whole life.
The following email will give you an idea of my work at Tata Steel approved by junior manager Mr Prashant Kumar Mohapatra, manager Mr Rajeev Ranjan and senior manager Mr Arvind Kumar. They were all part of my department at Tata Steel Limited.
So, I appeared for CAT 2014-15 and cleared the test with good marks. I got calls from various IIMs and private colleges. I chose IIM Rohtak and paid the advance amount to confirm my seat for the course on May 25, 2015.
On May 26, 2015, after confirming my seat for the course at IIM Rohtak, I applied for a study leave to HR Manager Mr Manish Kumar but the application was rejected by him. I requested for a written rejection which I got from Mr Manish Kumar. I talked with Senior Manager HRM Mr Rohan Kumar on phone. He too told me that I was ineligible for a study leave. The audio recording of the call is in my possession and the transcript has been attached. You may download the recorded call from here.
I was called to the department office by Head HRM Mr Vikas Kumar, where he, along with Head HRM Mrs Neena Bahadur, questioned me about my reasons for applying for study leave. I told them that I did not live with my parents, and therefore, I was facing difficulties in getting an education loan with my uncle as a guarantor. They further inquired about my responsibilities to my family and who else in my family was earning, etc.
On June 10, 2015, HRM Mr Sandeep Dhir called me to his office and asked me to write an application for condoning the two months of remaining work experience for approval of my application for study leave for IIM Rohtak. He then asked me about the colleges I had got admission offers from. I named the colleges but he asked me again. I repeated the same names of colleges.
He asked me to name all the colleges I had calls from, even if I had not converted. I told him that I had also received a call from IIM Lucknow but I could not convert it till date in the three lists which were released so I cannot name it. He asked me that if I could convert IIM Lucknow, will I like to take a study leave for studying there? I told him that I cannot say anything because the results are yet to arrive.
Mr Sandip Dhir told me that the list was already prepared and he knew about it through his connections with the institute.
I was forced to write that I have got admission in IIM Lucknow by Sandeep Dhir in his office before him, even when I did not. I never made a request for study leave for IIM Lucknow. Also, please note that the list of selected candidates wherein I was selected for admission to IIM Lucknow was only announced on June 12, 2015, via email. I was forced to write on June 10, 2015, that I have got admission to IIM Lucknow, whereas I have attached the emails to prove that the fourth list was announced only on June 12, 2015, and I received the admission offer from IIM Lucknow on June 15, 2015. I have attached a copy of the letter with the reply Tata Steel management gave to Deputy Labour Commissioner, Jamshedpur on March 22, 2018.
The way the letter dated June 10, 2015, is written with futuristic claims inserted here and there, itself shows that I was forced to write under pressure by HR Manager Sandeep Dhir in his presence in his office. Also, it is not mentioned anywhere in the application that I requested a study leave for Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, which the HR managers forced upon me in the form of study leave issued on June 12, 2015.
Please note that IIM Lucknow releases no waiting list or merit list that can be studied by a candidate to predict selection in the postgraduate programme. Being an industrial workman, I had no influence or means to predict my selection in IIM Lucknow. HR managers of Tata Steel, on the other hand, had connections and immeasurable influence in IIM Lucknow via the ex-managing director of Tata Steel and the then Chairman of Board of IIM Lucknow, Dr Jamshed Jiji Irani.
The same day I was also contacted by branch manager of Bistupur branch of Union Bank of India who told me that he was aware that I needed an education loan and was ready to sanction the loan if I get a study leave from Tata Steel Limited.
On June 12, 2015, I was again called by Mr Sandeep Dhir to his office. He gave me the documents for study leave. I told him that I am yet to receive the admission letter and the results are not yet declared for the fourth list. He told me that my name will surely be there in the fourth list.
On June 12, 2015, the results of the fourth list came out in the evening and I received an email from IIM Lucknow with an admission offer letter on June 15, 2015. I was happy to see that I had converted IIM Lucknow.
After admission, I was surprised at the discrimination inflicted upon me by all the teachers at the institute, especially by one Mr Abhijjit Bhattacharya, who straightaway gave me a zero in subject QAM-1. Other teachers too discriminated against me, gave me fewer marks and penalised me heavily in all the subjects. I was failed in multiple subjects and terminated from the course.
I was called by the Senior Manager HRM Mr Vikas Kumar and told to rejoin the job as I had failed in the programme, even though I had never informed him of my termination.
I approached the PGP Chairman of the Institute and made a request to him for allowing me to repeat the course as there was a rule allowing students who failed once to repeat the course once and many other students were also repeating the coourse after termination. So, my request via a written application for repeating the course was accepted.
I rejoined the course at IIM Lucknow. But this time, the teachers were more aggressive. They deducted my marks even when I wrote correct answers. I confronted two such professors, namely professor Prakash Singh and professor D. Tripathi Rao with the answer sheets I received, and made them aware of my knowledge of their wrongdoing. They assured me that if I worked hard, I could do well. I decided to let it be and be more alert in the future.
Professor Abhijit Bhattacharya told me face-to-face that he would fail me again and I should get zero in his subject, in the first class of his course. Eventually, he gave me the lowest marks in QAM-2 even though all my answers were correct.
On February 22, 2017, I was again terminated from term-2 and could not apply for repeating, having failed twice. I confronted the PGP Chairman professor Sushil Kumar and requested him to get my answer sheets re-evaluated and to allow me to attend classes for the ongoing term for which I had already paid the fees, but he gave no reply. I wrote to him an email stating my request. He still did not reply. I forwarded the email to the Director Dr Ajit Prasad.
To my surprise, the PGP Chairman ordered that my institute email ID be immediately blocked and instructed me to vacate the hostel and leave the institute campus immediately. I got two copies of letters drafted by a court advocate at Lucknow and submitted one copy of the same via registered post to the Director of IIM Lucknow requesting for re-evaluation of my answer sheets and allowing me to attend the ongoing term for which I had already paid the fees. I also approached Dr Jamshed Jiji Irani for inquiry, but as he had himself planned the ploy, he was afraid to face me. So, he lied that he was no longer the Chairman of Board of Governors of IIM Lucknow. But records prove otherwise. The evidence is below.
I somehow managed to pack my belongings in haste and returned to my home in Jamshedpur. (All the emails are in my possession because I had copied all emails from Institute email id to various other personal email IDs).
I emailed the Chairman of Board of Governors of the Institute, Dr J. J. Irani, but as he was himself facilitating the whole scandal, he refused to interfere. When I later emailed him requesting for an appointment, he replied to me not to email him as he was no longer the Chairman of Board of Governors of IIM Lucknow
I also lodged a grievance with the MHRD on February 28, 2017, with registration number DSEHE/E/2017/0538. Soon after lodging the grievance, I received an email from the Student Council of IIM Lucknow that if I submit a handwritten application requesting for readmission, I will be allowed to repeat the course from the beginning. Whereas after my termination and before lodging the grievance, when I requested for such an accommodation, the PGP Chairman informed me that it was impossible under the rules of the institute. The rule was also stated in my termination letter that a student who has failed twice cannot apply for repeating the course.
So, I refused to repeat the course and requested in reply for allowing me admission to the second year of the course, but received no reply to my request. This has been the case up to date. After one month of lodging the grievance, I received a reply from the CAO Mr Vishwa Ranjan that my answer sheets will not be reevaluated as it was mentioned in the rules of the institute. I requested to all the officials at the MHRD to interfere in the matter, but no one replied to my emails. I requested to meet the officials at MHRD but have received no reply until date. The grievance was closed after two months.
The Central Universities Act, 2009 specifically lays down that rules must be made to increase transparency.
But the Institute made some new rules to reduce transparency. These rules were made only to hide the unfair evaluation, after I confronted the professors with their act of unfair evaluation and wrongdoing:
- Question papers will be only given during the examination and must be returned with the answer sheets at the end of examinations.
- Answer sheets will not be given to students. They will only be shown once on a time provided to the student via an email at a very short notice the same day.
- Students cannot approach Professors for discussing the answer sheets nor can they request a revaluation of answers.
On June 15, 2017, I received a reply from Mr Vishawa Ranjan, CAO, IIM Lucknow, who is the public information officer of Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, wherein he denied me information under the RTI Act for my filed RTI number IIMLK/R/2017/50306. I informed the Director Dr Ajit Prasad and CAO Mr Vishwa Ranjan regarding the denial of information and its consequences and warned him of consequences contending that the practice was in contempt of a 2011 judgment — CBSE & Anr. Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors — of the Supreme Court, which held that an “answer sheet is an information under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act and therefore, examinees/students have a fundamental and legal right of having access to their answer sheets under RTI Act.”
I filed the first appeal to my RTI which was again denied and returned. It was clear that the authorities at Indian Institute of Management Lucknow were trying their best to conceal the facts of the matter to hide their corrupt and illegal practices. I have filed a second appeal and complaint to Central Information Commission for which I am still awaiting a reply. (Reply to RTI IIMLK/R/2017/50306 and consequent reply to first appeal in possession).
The institute even broke its own written rules so that Professor Abhijit Bhattacharya would be able to hide his shameless actions.
Rule: Midterm answer sheets must be given to students. But Professor Abhijit Bhattacharya insisted on keeping both the Midterm and Endterm answer sheets as can be seen from the email below.
The email specifically says, “Students are not allowed to take answer books out of the classroom.” This was done against written institute rules only so that the students were not able to compare the answers and the unfair evaluation done by Professor Abhijit Bhattacharya.
Even the Chief Administrative Officer of IIM Lucknow, Mr Vishwa Ranjan has cited the same rule in reply to my RTI query.
Please note that Chief Administrative Officer of IIM Lucknow Mr Vishwa Ranjan resigned from his post as soon as I filed a writ in High Court at Lucknow in August 2017 against his RTI reply for reasons known best to him. The writ is still pending court till date.
Meanwhile, the Senior Manager HRM Mr Vikas Kumar called me and told me that as I have failed in the course, I must rejoin the job at Tata Steel back as soon as possible or else I may lose the job too. I was shocked again. He knew about my termination even though I did not inform him of my termination from the Institute. But helpless, I told him that I would join on March 15, 2017. He asked me to write an email requesting for rejoining. When I sent the email, he asked to specifically write the reason accepting that I had failed due to my fault. I only bolded the sentence that I have been terminated due to poor academic performance. When I joined, he instructed me to write a handwritten letter requesting joining the job after termination from IIM Lucknow.
After some days of working at the job, he met me in my work area and told me how Tata Steel had planned my termination even before my admission. He also warned me that management of Tata Steel was very powerful and that if I did not stop complaining against the termination order, I would face severe consequences.
I asked the Managing Director of Tata Steel Mr TV Narendran for a meeting via email. He replied that he was travelling so I should meet the PEO Mr Avneesh Gupta. I insisted on meeting him but when I did not get an appointment with him, then I took another appointment and met the PEO Mr Avneesh Gupta and informed him of the whole situation on May 9, 2017. He told me that he would take proper action and find the truth. He also assured me that I will soon receive a response to my complaint.
But I was afraid to go to work at the factory because Mr Vikas Kumar had threatened to kill me and make it look like an accident as he had allegedly killed Mr RR Jha (an employee who was found burnt to death in the Coke plant under suspicious conditions) a few years back. I felt insecure after complaining to the PEO Mr Avneesh Gupta. It should be noted that there are fatalities happening all around the year in Jamshedpur Works of Tata Steel Limited. So, it is an easy task for the management to eliminate me and cover it up as an accident-on-job in any such incident. So fearing for my well being and life, I informed the MD and PEO of my fear and discontinued going to work after April 30, 2017 until the matter was resolved.
I was issued a charge sheet from Chief, Coke Plant, Tata Steel Limited for absence from the job. HR manager Vikas Kumar threatened to kill me and make it look like a plant accident if I did not resign. So, I had to resign under force from the job at Tata Steel Limited, issued legal notices to TV Narendran and Jamshed Jiji Irani and requested to settle my provident fund and other dues and inform me of anything required from my side for the process of resignation.
I served legal notices to Mr TV Narendran, Managing Director, Tata Steel Limited, Dr Jamshed J. Irani, Former Managing Director, Tata Steel Limited and Chairman of Board of Governors, IIM Lucknow and Dr Ajit Prasad, Director, IIM Lucknow to which I have received no reply until date.
On May 20, 2017, Mr Avneesh Gupta replied to my complaint via an email denying the allegations and advising me to rejoin the job at Tata Steel Limited immediately. On the same day, National Human Resource Commission (NHRC), where I had filed a complaint with case number 14056/24/48/2017 issued directions to MHRD for investigating the matter and providing details of the action taken within eight weeks. But I have received no details of action from MHRD or NHRC till date.
After multiple requests and complaints, only a sorry attempt was made from PMO to which the Managing Director of Tata Steel Mr TV. Narendran has not replied till date.
The criminal complaint case against the above stated still lies before the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court has been abstaining from even listening to my petition to date.
Frustrated with the inaction by the above-mentioned respondents and authorities, I am forced to expose the reality to all through social media. Meanwhile, authorities at IIM Lucknow and Tata Steel Limited may tamper with the evidence, and may kill me to shut my voice, framing it as an accident. So, timely action must be taken to save my career and life and expose the illegal privatisation of Indian Institute of Management Lucknow by the Tata management.
The post Deliberately Made To Fail, Given Death Threats: My Experience At IIM Lucknow & Tata Steel appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.